Retrieval Pipeline

TLDR

A Retrieval Pipeline is the system component responsible for fetching relevant documents from vast unstructured data stores, serving as the critical bridge between static knowledge and generative intelligence. In the context of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), the pipeline transforms a user's natural language query into a set of high-signal context chunks that ground the Large Language Model's (LLM) response in factual reality.

Modern pipelines have evolved beyond simple keyword matching to leverage Representational Learning, where data is projected into high-dimensional latent spaces. Engineering a production-grade pipeline requires balancing the "RAG Triad": Context Relevance (retrieving the right data), Faithfulness (ensuring the LLM uses only that data), and Answer Relevance (satisfying the user's intent). Key technologies enabling this include Hierarchical Navigable Small World (HNSW) indexing, hybrid search algorithms, and multi-stage re-ranking architectures.

---

Conceptual Overview

The fundamental theory of a modern Retrieval Pipeline is rooted in the shift from lexical overlap to semantic proximity. Traditional Information Retrieval (IR) systems, such as those based on TF-IDF or BM25, relied on the presence of specific words. Modern pipelines, however, utilize deep learning to understand the underlying meaning of text.

Representational Learning and Latent Space

At the heart of the pipeline is the concept of Representational Learning. Documents and queries are passed through an embedding model (a neural network like BERT or RoBERTa) which maps them into a Latent Space. This space is a high-dimensional vector environment (often 768 or 1536 dimensions) where semantic similarity is mathematically represented as geometric distance.

If a user asks about "the cost of living in Berlin," and a document discusses "apartment prices and grocery expenses in the German capital," their vectors will be positioned close together in this space, even if they share few identical keywords. The distance is typically measured using:

• Cosine Similarity: Measures the cosine of the angle between two vectors, focusing on orientation rather than magnitude.
• Euclidean Distance (L2): Measures the straight-line distance between two points in space.
• Inner Product: Measures the projection of one vector onto another, often used when vector magnitudes are significant.

The Two-Phase Architecture

A robust Retrieval Pipeline is architecturally divided into two distinct operational phases:

1. Ingestion (Offline Phase): This is the data preparation stage. Raw data (PDFs, Markdown, SQL exports) is cleaned and partitioned into "chunks." These chunks are embedded and stored in a specialized Vector Database. This phase is "offline" because it happens before a user ever asks a question.
2. Inference (Online Phase): This occurs in real-time. When a query arrives, the pipeline embeds the query, searches the vector database for the most similar chunks (Top-K), optionally re-ranks them, and passes the final context to the LLM.

 and then to the 'LLM' alongside a 'System Prompt'. A central 'Evaluation' box highlights the 'RAG Triad': Context Relevance, Faithfulness, and Answer Relevance.)

---

Practical Implementations

Building a Retrieval Pipeline that scales to millions of documents while maintaining sub-second latency requires sophisticated engineering of the indexing and retrieval layers.

Indexing Strategies: HNSW and IVF

To avoid the "curse of dimensionality"—where searching through millions of high-dimensional vectors becomes computationally prohibitive—pipelines use Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) algorithms.

• HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small Worlds): Currently the industry standard. It builds a multi-layered graph structure. The top layers are sparse, allowing for "long-range jumps" across the vector space, while the bottom layers are dense, allowing for "fine-grained" local searches. This structure allows the pipeline to find relevant documents in logarithmic time ($O(\log N)$).
• IVF (Inverted File Index): This method partitions the vector space into clusters (Voronoi cells). At query time, the system identifies the closest cluster centroids and only searches within those clusters, significantly reducing the number of comparisons.

Metadata Filtering and the Trie

In production, semantic search is rarely enough. Users often need to filter results by date, category, or file path. This is where metadata filtering comes in. A Trie (a prefix tree for strings) is frequently used within the pipeline's metadata layer to enable lightning-fast prefix matching. For example, if a user wants to search only within the /engineering/docs/v2/ directory, a Trie can instantly prune the search space to only include documents whose path metadata matches that prefix, ensuring the vector search is restricted to the correct subset of data.

Chunking: The Granularity Problem

The way text is split—chunking—determines the "resolution" of the retrieval.

• Recursive Character Chunking: Splits text based on a hierarchy of characters (paragraphs, then sentences, then words) to keep chunks within a specific token limit while preserving semantic context.
• Semantic Chunking: A more advanced method that uses the embedding model itself to identify "breakpoints" where the topic of the text shifts, ensuring each chunk is a self-contained semantic unit.

Hybrid Search and RRF

To capture both semantic intent and exact keyword matches (like product IDs or technical acronyms), pipelines implement Hybrid Search. This combines:

1. Dense Retrieval: Vector-based search for meaning.
2. Sparse Retrieval: BM25-based search for keyword frequency. The results are merged using Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF), a formula that calculates a combined score based on the rank of a document in both search methods, ensuring that documents appearing high in either list are prioritized.

---

Advanced Techniques

Once a basic pipeline is functional, optimization focuses on increasing precision and handling complex user intents.

Multi-Stage Retrieval and Re-ranking

Initial retrieval (Stage 1) usually uses Bi-Encoders, which are fast because they embed the query and documents independently. However, they cannot capture the fine-grained interaction between query words and document words. To solve this, a Re-ranker (Stage 2) is introduced. This is typically a Cross-Encoder that takes the query and a retrieved document together as a single input. While too slow to run on millions of documents, it is highly accurate when run on the top 50-100 candidates from Stage 1.

Optimization via "A" (Comparing Prompt Variants)

The performance of a Retrieval Pipeline is highly sensitive to how the query is phrased. Engineers use a systematic process of Optimization via A (Comparing prompt variants) to maximize retrieval recall. This involves:

• Query Expansion: Using an LLM to generate multiple versions of the user's query (e.g., "How to fix a leak" becomes "Plumbing repair guide," "Fixing water pipe leak," etc.).
• HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings): The LLM generates a "fake" answer to the query, and the pipeline uses the embedding of that fake answer to find real documents that look like it. By comparing these variants (A), teams can determine which query transformation strategy yields the highest Context Relevance score.

Query Rewriting and Transformation

In conversational RAG, users often use pronouns ("How do I fix it?"). An advanced pipeline includes a Query Rewriter that looks at the conversation history and transforms the vague query into a standalone, context-rich search term ("How do I fix the leaking faucet in the kitchen?") before it hits the vector index.

---

Research and Future Directions

The landscape of retrieval is shifting from static pipelines to dynamic, "agentic" architectures.

Late Interaction: ColBERT

Research into Late Interaction models like ColBERT (Khattab & Zaharia, 2020) offers a middle ground between Bi-Encoders and Cross-Encoders. Instead of compressing a whole document into one vector, ColBERT stores a vector for every single token. During retrieval, it uses a "MaxSim" operation to align query tokens with document tokens. This provides the precision of a Cross-Encoder with the speed of a Bi-Encoder.

Agentic Retrieval and Multi-Hop Reasoning

The next generation of Retrieval Pipelines will be "Agentic." Instead of a single search, an agent will decompose a complex question into multiple steps. For example, to answer "How does the 2024 tax law affect my 2023 investments?", the agent might:

1. Retrieve the 2024 tax law.
2. Retrieve the user's 2023 investment portfolio.
3. Perform a "multi-hop" reasoning step to synthesize the two.

The "Lost in the Middle" Challenge

As LLM context windows expand to millions of tokens, some suggest retrieval is becoming obsolete. However, research into the "Lost in the Middle" phenomenon shows that LLMs are significantly less effective at extracting information from the middle of a massive prompt than from the beginning or end. Therefore, the Retrieval Pipeline remains essential for Context Pruning—the art of selecting only the most relevant 1% of data to ensure the LLM stays focused and accurate.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the difference between a Bi-Encoder and a Cross-Encoder?

A Bi-Encoder embeds the query and the document separately into two vectors and calculates their similarity (fast, used for initial retrieval). A Cross-Encoder processes the query and document simultaneously as a single input, allowing for deep interaction between tokens (slow, used for re-ranking the top results).

Q: How does a Trie improve retrieval performance?

A Trie (Prefix tree for strings) is used for efficient metadata filtering. If your dataset is partitioned by hierarchical categories (e.g., Region > Country > City), a Trie allows the pipeline to instantly filter out millions of irrelevant documents based on a prefix match before the more expensive vector similarity calculations begin.

Q: What is the "RAG Triad" in pipeline evaluation?

The RAG Triad consists of three metrics:

1. Context Relevance: Did the retrieval pipeline find the right information?
2. Faithfulness: Is the LLM's answer derived strictly from the retrieved context?
3. Answer Relevance: Does the final response actually answer the user's question?

Q: Why is "A" (Comparing prompt variants) necessary for retrieval?

Users often provide suboptimal queries. By using A (Comparing prompt variants), developers can test whether techniques like Query Expansion or HyDE significantly improve the quality of the retrieved documents compared to using the raw user query.

Q: When should I use Hybrid Search instead of pure Vector Search?

Use Hybrid Search when your data contains specific technical terms, product IDs, or rare acronyms that embedding models might not have seen during training. The keyword-based component (BM25) ensures these exact matches are found, while the vector component handles semantic meaning.