Back to Learn
intermediate

Core Foundations What Makes An Ai Agent

An AI agent is a complex system that transcends the capabilities of a standalone Large Language Model (LLM) by integrating cognitive, functional, and governance layers. At its...

TLDR

An AI agent is a complex system that transcends the capabilities of a standalone Large Language Model (LLM) by integrating cognitive, functional, and governance layers. At its core, the Brain (LLM) provides reasoning and language understanding, but it requires Planning to decompose goals, Memory to persist state across time, and Tool Use to interact with the external world. This interaction occurs within a defined Environment via structured Interfaces, all while being governed by a Policy & Control Layer that ensures security and alignment. Together, these components form a "Perception-Action Loop" capable of autonomous goal achievement.

Conceptual Overview

To understand an AI agent, one must move beyond the "chatbot" paradigm and adopt a Systems View. In this framework, the agent is an autonomous entity that perceives its environment, reasons about its state, and executes actions to achieve a specific objective. This process is not linear but cyclical, often referred to as the Perception-Action Loop.

The Cognitive Core: Brain, Planning, and Memory

The "Brain" of the agent is the LLM, which serves as the central processing unit. However, an LLM is inherently stateless and reactive. To achieve agency, it must be augmented with:

  1. Planning: This is the "pre-computation" phase. Before executing a task, the agent uses techniques like Chain of Thought (CoT) or Tree of Thoughts (ToT) to create a roadmap. This prevents "hallucination loops" and ensures resource efficiency.
  2. Memory Hierarchy: Agents utilize a tripartite memory structure. Working Memory (the context window) handles immediate tasks; Episodic Memory records past interactions; and Semantic Memory stores generalized facts. By leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), the agent can access vast external knowledge bases, effectively expanding its "parametric memory" with "non-parametric" storage.

The Functional Bridge: Tool Use and Perception

An agent without tools is a "brain in a vat." Tool Use (Action) transforms the agent into an active executor. This is rooted in the theory of distributed cognition, where the agent's intelligence is spread across its neural weights and the external tools it manipulates (e.g., calculators, APIs, or web browsers).

Perception & Multimodality allow the agent to ingest diverse data types—text, images, and audio—into a Joint Embedding Space. This ensures that the agent's "World Model" is robust, following the Principle of Inverse Effectiveness, where multiple weak signals (e.g., a blurry image and a muffled audio clip) combine to create a strong, certain perception.

The Governance Layer: Policy and Environment

The agent operates within an Environment—the sum of all external variables. The Interface acts as the formal contract (often a JSON-based API) between the agent and this environment. To manage these interactions at scale, the Policy & Control Layer functions as a "Control Plane," similar to Software-Defined Networking (SDN). It intercepts actions to enforce security, budgetary limits, and compliance rules without needing to modify the underlying LLM code.

Infographic: The Agentic Architecture StackInfographic: The Agentic Architecture Stack The diagram depicts a central LLM "Brain" connected to Memory (Vector DB) and Planning (Logic) modules. This core is wrapped in a Policy & Control Layer. The entire system interacts with the Environment through an Interface (Sensors/Actuators), creating a continuous Perception-Action Loop.

Practical Implementations

Building a functional agent requires orchestrating these disparate components into a unified workflow.

Integrating Tools with Make

For many enterprise agents, the "Environment" consists of SaaS applications. Using Make, developers can create sophisticated "Action" layers. Make provides the visual glue to connect an LLM's function calls to hundreds of external APIs (Slack, Salesforce, Google Drive). When the Brain decides it needs to "send an email," it generates a structured JSON output that Make interprets and executes, returning the result (success/failure) back to the agent's memory.

Managing State and Context

Practical implementation often involves a "State Machine" that manages the transition between planning and execution.

  • Short-term persistence: Managed via Redis or similar fast-access caches to store the current session's "Working Memory."
  • Long-term persistence: Managed via Vector Databases (like Pinecone or Weaviate) to store "Episodic Memory," allowing the agent to remember a user's preferences from a conversation three months ago.

The Interface Contract

The interface must be strictly defined. Using OpenAPI specifications or TypeChat ensures that the LLM's "Action" outputs are valid. If the agent attempts to call a tool with incorrect parameters, the Interface layer should provide an error message that the Brain can use to "self-correct" its next attempt.

Advanced Techniques

As agentic systems mature, the focus shifts from basic execution to optimization and multi-agent coordination.

Optimization via "A"

In complex environments, the performance of an agent is highly sensitive to its system prompt and planning strategy. Using A, developers can systematically compare prompt variants to determine which "Planning" logic (e.g., "Act as a Project Manager" vs. "Act as a Software Architect") yields the highest success rate for a given task. This empirical approach to prompt engineering is essential for refining the Policy & Control Layer.

Hierarchical Planning and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)

Advanced agents do not work in isolation. They utilize Hierarchical Planning, where a "Manager Agent" decomposes a high-level goal and delegates sub-tasks to "Worker Agents."

  • Worker Agents may have specialized tools and local memory.
  • The Manager Agent maintains the global state and enforces the Policy Layer across the entire swarm. This mirrors human organizational structures and allows for the solution of "wicked problems" that are too large for a single context window.

Vector-Symbolic Architectures (VSA)

To bridge the gap between neural processing (LLMs) and symbolic reasoning (Logic), researchers are exploring VSAs. These allow agents to represent complex relationships as high-dimensional vectors that can be manipulated using algebraic operations, providing a more mathematically rigorous foundation for "Semantic Memory."

Research and Future Directions

The frontier of AI agency lies in the convergence of cognitive neuroscience and computer science.

Neuro-Computational Convergence

Recent studies show that the layer-wise processing in LLMs mirrors the hierarchical dynamics of the human brain's language centers. Future research aims to implement "Artificial Hippocampi"—dedicated modules for rapid memory encoding and consolidation—to move beyond the limitations of current RAG implementations.

World Models and Predictive Coding

Current agents are often "reactive." The next generation of agents will likely incorporate World Models, allowing them to simulate the outcomes of their actions in a "mental sandbox" before executing them in the real environment. This is based on the Predictive Coding framework, where the agent's primary goal is to minimize "surprise" (prediction error) about its environment.

Autonomous Evolution

We are moving toward agents that can "self-improve" by analyzing their own "Episodic Memory." By reviewing past failures and successes, an agent could theoretically update its own "Planning" strategies or suggest modifications to its "Policy Layer," leading to a form of recursive self-optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How does the "Policy & Control Layer" differ from a standard system prompt?

While a system prompt provides initial instructions, the Policy & Control Layer is an external governance framework. It acts as a "Control Plane" that can intercept and block actions in real-time based on dynamic rules (e.g., "Do not spend more than $50 on API calls today") that are independent of the LLM's internal state.

Q: Why is "Tool Use" considered "Distributed Cognition"?

In distributed cognition, the "intelligence" is not just in the brain but in the interaction with the environment. When an agent uses a tool (like a Python interpreter), the actual computation happens externally. The agent's role is to formulate the problem and interpret the result, making the tool an extension of its cognitive process.

Q: What is the "Principle of Inverse Effectiveness" in multimodal perception?

This principle states that the benefit of integrating multiple senses is greatest when the individual sensory inputs are weak or ambiguous. For an agent, this means that if a text prompt is vague, a corresponding image or data log can provide the necessary context to resolve the ambiguity.

Q: How does "Episodic Memory" prevent hallucination?

Hallucinations often occur when an LLM lacks specific context and "fills in the blanks" with statistically likely but factually incorrect data. Episodic Memory provides a verifiable record of past events. By retrieving the actual history of an interaction, the agent grounds its reasoning in facts rather than probability.

Q: Can "Make" be used to build a "Policy Layer"?

While Make is primarily an integration platform for "Tool Use," it can facilitate policy enforcement. For example, a Make scenario can include "Filter" or "Router" modules that check an agent's request against a database of allowed actions or budgets before passing the command to the final SaaS API.

Related Articles